Maythe Force Be With You

Opinion

Legends is not a consolation prize

Twelve years after the reset, the case for reading the old Expanded Universe on its own terms rather than as a might-have-been.

· B. Mays

There is a tone people use about Legends books that I have started to find genuinely irritating. It is elegiac. It treats a shelf of novels as a graveyard — as though the correct emotional response to Heir to the Empire in 2026 is grief for a continuity that got cancelled.

Nothing was cancelled. A label changed.

What a Legends book is

It is a novel that was published, sold, read, and is still in print. When Lucasfilm moved this material under the Legends banner on 25 April 2014, the statement was explicit that demand would keep the titles available, and it has. Del Rey went further in June 2021 and launched the Essential Legends Collection — new trade paperback editions with newly commissioned covers, starting with Heir to the Empire, Drew Karpyshyn’s Darth Bane: Path of Destruction and Matthew Stover’s Shatterpoint. Publishers do not commission cover art for the dead.

The category error

The elegiac reading assumes that the point of a tie-in novel is to be canonical, and that a book which stops counting has lost its reason to exist. But nobody reads Middlemarch for its continuity status. The reason to read a novel is that it is a good novel, and the 1991 Thrawn trilogy is a good thriller whether or not a television series agrees with it.

There is also a practical point. Continuity status is not a property of the book, it is a property of the licensing arrangement around the book. It can change — it did change, and it changed back for at least one character, when Thrawn re-entered canon via Star Wars Rebels in 2016. Attaching your reading pleasure to that variable is attaching it to something that has nothing to do with the prose.

What the elegy costs you

It makes you read defensively. If you approach the Legends shelf as a museum of things that did not happen, you spend the whole book comparing it to a version of the galaxy that displaced it, instead of reading the book that is in front of you. That is a miserable way to read anything.

The counter-argument, fairly stated

People who feel the loss are not being silly. Twenty-three years of published material was arranged into a shared future, that future had an internal logic, and a lot of readers had spent real money and real years inside it. Being told it no longer constrains anything is a genuine deflation. I am not arguing that the feeling is irrational. I am arguing that it has had twelve years, and it is now getting in the way.

The recommendation

Read the Legends shelf the way you would read any other completed series by multiple hands: for the good books, skipping the weak ones, without a running commentary about what it all means for the timeline. It is a large, uneven, frequently excellent body of genre fiction. That is enough for any shelf to be.

Opinion column. Dates and publishing facts above are sourced; the argument is mine.

From the library

Referenced books